Generative Ai Policy
Generative AI tools (for example, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and similar tools) can help with language and organization, but they can also produce errors, invented references, and biased or copied text. JPK allows limited use of these tools when it is open, honest, and checked by people. This is especially important for research about learners with disabilities, where accuracy and respect matter.
- Do not enter personal or confidential data of participants, especially children and persons with disabilities, into AI tools.
- Text produced with AI is included in the similarity check like any other text.
- Figures or images created with AI must be labeled as such and must not present false evidence.
- Manuscripts under review are confidential. Do not upload a manuscript, or parts of it, into a generative AI tool.
- The review must be written by the reviewer. AI may be used only to improve the language of the reviewer's own comments, without including manuscript content.
- Reviewers remain responsible for the accuracy and fairness of their review. See Peer Review Process.
- Editors do not upload submitted manuscripts or reviewer reports into generative AI tools.
- Decisions on manuscripts are made by editors, not by AI tools.
- Editors may use AI for routine tasks that do not involve confidential content, such as correcting the language of general messages.
Authors state the use of generative AI in a short statement placed before the References, in the declarations section of the manuscript. If no AI tool was used, state this too.
If not used: "No generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript."
Undisclosed use, invented references, or fabricated content may lead to a request for correction, rejection of the manuscript, or, for published articles, action under Correction, Retraction & Withdrawal. See also Research Misconduct.
This policy may be updated as technology and publishing standards develop.








