Become a Reviewer

Become a Reviewer
Join the reviewers of JPK (Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus) and contribute to the quality of research on special and inclusive education.
1Why Reviewers Matter

Peer reviewers help JPK publish accurate, ethical, and useful research. Their expert and fair assessment supports authors in improving their work and helps editors make sound decisions. We welcome reviewers from universities, research institutions, schools, and professional practice who work in special and inclusive education and related fields.

2Who Can Apply
  • Expertise in a topic within the Focus and Scope of JPK, such as special and inclusive education, assessment and early intervention, instruction and curriculum adaptation, assistive technology, rehabilitation, or family and community partnership.
  • Experience in research and scholarly publication, for example publications in national or international journals.
  • Ability to review manuscripts in Indonesian or English.
  • Willingness to follow the journal's ethics policies and keep manuscripts confidential.
3How to Apply
1
Open the reviewer form
Click Fill Out the Reviewer Form on this page. The form opens in a new tab.
2
Fill in your details
Complete all fields in the form, such as your name, institution, email, areas of expertise, and relevant publications.
3
Submit the form
The editorial team will check your information and contact you by email. Applying does not guarantee an invitation, because reviewers are selected according to the topics of submitted manuscripts.
4Reviewer Responsibilities
  • Confidentiality: manuscripts under review are confidential and must not be shared, copied, or entered into generative AI tools. See Generative AI Policy.
  • Double-blind review: do not try to identify the authors. If you think you know who the authors are, tell the editor. See Peer Review Process.
  • Conflict of interest: decline a review if you have a conflict of interest with the authors or the work. See Conflict of Interest.
  • Fair and constructive: give objective, specific, and respectful comments, and a clear recommendation: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
  • Ethics: report suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or other misconduct to the editor. See Publication Ethics.
  • Respond honestly: if you cannot review a manuscript, let the editor know so that another reviewer can be invited.
5Questions

If you have questions about becoming a reviewer, contact the editorial office.