Legal analysis of the application of the principle of Contrarius Actus related to the cancellation of documents to fulfil citizen's right in population administration at the population and civil registration office
Keywords:
Cancellation of Population Documents, Citizen Rights, Contrarius Actus PrincipleAbstract
This research describes and examines the implementation of the Contrarius Actus principle in cancelling population documents and the obstacles to applying the Contrarius Actus principle in cancelling population documents. The type of research used is descriptive empirical research with a qualitative approach. The description of the research results is complemented by primary and literature data relevant to the research topic. The results of this study indicate that the application of cancelling population documents through the Contrarius Actus principle has its criteria, namely, not changing the meaning in population documents and population documents issued by the Population and Civil Registration Office. Based on the analysis of implementation theory by Merilee S. Grindle, implementing the Contrarius Actus principle in cancelling population documents follows and fulfils the indicators of the success of policy implementation, namely policy content and implementation environment. Although this implementation has gone well, some internal and external obstacles remain. Internal barriers include the absence of templates and detailed steps from the centre and the absence of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) updates. External barriers include the high number of applications, the lack of understanding of this principle among the population, and the difficulty in determining the time between the applicant and the head of the field for the interview.
References
De Vanna, F. (2015). The “Doctrine of Principles” in neo-constitutional theories and the principle of reasonableness in action. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19180-5_5
Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the third world. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m323qj
Hadjon, P. M., & Djatmiati, T. S. (2024). Argumentasi hukum (Eleventh). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Izhharulhaq, M. Y., Rompis, A. E., & Cahyadini, A. (2020). The role of the Contrarius Actus principle in oversight of the growth and development of community organizations. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 8(3), 432. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.31702
Nalle, V. I. (2017). Asas Contarius Actus pada Perpu ormas: Kritik dalam perspektif hukum Administrasi Negara dan Hak Asasi Manusia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 4(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n2.a2
Neves, M. (2021). Constitutionalism and the paradox of principles and rules: Between the hydra and hercules. In Constitutionalism and the Paradox of Principles and Rules: Between the Hydra and Hercules. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898746.001.0001
Radchuk, A., Slavinska, I., Izbash, K., Branowicki, W., & Kozhemiakina, T. (2023). Principles of law in legal regulation of public relations in modern conditions. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(2), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1485
Sukadi, I. (2019). The Contrarius Actus principle as the government’s contral to the freedom of association and assembly in Indonesia. Mimbar Keadilan, 12(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i2.2457
Tuzov, D. (2016). Contra ius sententiam dare. Profiles of nullity of judgements in breach of substantive law in the opinions of late classical roman jurists | Contra ius sententiam dare. Profili dell’invalidità della sentenza contraria a diritto nella riflessione giurispru. Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 66(1), 5–34.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to transfer the transfer copyright of the article to The Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan effective if and when the paper is accepted for publication.
Authors and other parties are bound to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License for the published articles, legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA).