EVALUASI DESAIN PROFIL PENAMPANG MELINTANG TERHADAP KINERJA PERISAI KOLONG BELAKANG PADA TRUK MENGACU STANDAR KESELAMATAN KENDARAAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v9i1.97360Keywords:
rear underrun protection, finite element analysis, cross sectional profile, structural safetyAbstract
Rear underrun protection is a passive safety device installed on freight vehicles whose rear ground clearance exceeds 700 mm and whose rearmost axle is located more than 1,000 mm from the vehicle rear end. The geometric disparity between heavy and light vehicles creates a critical safety hazard, wherein the front structure of a light vehicle may underride the chassis of a heavy vehicle during a collision event, thereby significantly increasing the likelihood of severe or fatal injuries. Consequently, the presence and structural performance of rear underrun protection systems constitute a crucial element in mitigating road traffic crash severity. This study aims to assess the structural performance of four alternative rear underrun protection designs with respect to compliance with Indonesian regulatory standards, specifically Ministerial Regulation PM 74/2021 and Indonesian National Standard SNI 7522:2009. The investigated designs employ commonly adopted cross sectional profiles. The methodological framework involves geometric modeling of the underrun protection structures followed by numerical simulation using finite element analysis to characterize stress distribution and deformation behavior under loading conditions. The simulation results indicate that the maximum von Mises stresses in all design variants exceed the material yield strength, with peak stress concentrations occurring at the support members near the vehicle frame connection. The maximum stresses are 12.041 MPa for the channel profile, 5.627 MPa for the square profile, 2.846 MPa for the box profile, and 1.807 MPa for the pipe profile. Maximum displacements are observed at the free end of the transverse beam. Although deformation levels remain within the allowable deflection limit of 400 mm, the resulting deflections vary significantly across designs, namely 245 mm (channel), 119 mm (square), 21.8 mm (box), and 25.9 mm (pipe).
References
Abid, H. M., Roslin, E. N., & Jalal, R. I. B. A. (2019). Performance of rear under-ride protection device (RUPD) during car to heavy truck rear impact. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 3367–3375. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F9504.088619
Al-Bahash, Z. F., Ansari, M. N. M., & Shah, Q. H. (2018). Design and simulation of a rear underride protection device (RUPD) for heavy vehicles. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 23(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2017.1302040
Arrozi, W., Widyianto, A., Sampurno, Y. G., Paryanto, Widowati, A., Aminatun, T., & Sunarta. (2025). Desain Dan Analisis Teleskopik Silinder Hidrolik Pada Mesin Pres Hidrolik Mobile. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 7(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpvo.v7i2.84015
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2009). SNI 7522-2009 - Perlengkapan perisai kolong bagian belakang untuk kendaraan bermotor kategori N2, N3, O3 dan O4. Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2020). Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design (Tenth). McGraw-Hill Education.
Endang, K. (2022). Simulasi Numerik Pengujian Pelengkapan Perisai Kolong Bagaian Belakang Mengunakan Metode Elemen Hingga. 16(1), 1–23.
Ferdinand P. Beer, Johnston, E. R., DeWolf, J. T., & Mazurek, D. (2015). Mechanics of Materials (Sevebth). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gidlewski, M., Jackowski, J., & Posuniak, P. (2022). Review and Analysis of Technical Designs of Rear Underrun Protective Devices (RUPDs) in Terms of Regulatory Compliance. Sensors, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072645
Gunawan, R. (1988). Tabel Profil Kontruksi Baja. Kanisius.
Hibbeler, R. C. (2017). Mechanics of Materials (Tenth Edit). Pearson Education, Inc.
Ijazi, M. R. (2025). Evaluasi Pemenuhan Persyaratan Teknis Perisai Kolong Kendaraan Barang Berdasarkan Regulasi.
International Transport Forum. (2025). Road Safety Annual Report 2025.
Özgün Sunar. (2022). Is Your Mesh Good Enough? Mechead.Com. https://www.mechead.com/mesh-good-enough
Pooudom, S., Chanthanumataporn, S., Koetniyom, S., & Carmai, J. (2019). Design and Development of Truck Rear Underrun Protection Device. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 501(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012017
Pusiknas. (2026). Statistik Laka Lantas. Pusat Informasi Kriminal Nasional. https://pusiknas.polri.go.id/laka_lantas
Rahayuningsih, R. (2025). Menhub: 27.337 Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Melibatkan Angkutan Barang. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/menhub-27-337-kecelakaan-lalu-lintas-melibatkan-angkutan-barang-1825423
Satria, G., & Agung, K. (2025). Tingkat Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas di Indonesia Mencapai 205.783 Kasus. Kompas.Com. https://otomotif.kompas.com/read/2025/06/19/114200615/tingkat-kecelakaan-lalu-lintas-di-indonesia-mencapai-205.783-kasus?
Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L., & J.Z. Zhu. (2013). The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals (Seventh Ed). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-24909-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpvo.






