Readiness, acceptance, and social presence in full online learning

Gaffar Hafiz Sagala; Ali Fikri Hasibuan; Tuti Sriwedari

doi:10.21831/jk.v6i1.44970

Authors

Gaffar Hafiz Sagala
hafizsagala@unimed.ac.id
Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0296-6111
Ali Fikri Hasibuan Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Tuti Sriwedari Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022)

Artikel

Accepted May 14, 2022

Published May 17, 2022

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This study aimed to examine the effect of lecturer readiness in online learning on the acceptance of lecturers in online learning applications, and the effect of lecturer acceptance in online learning applications on the lecturer's perception of social presence. The subjects of this study were the lecturers at the Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Medan which was taken by a total sampling technique. This study used a survey method with electronic questionnaires to collect data. Of the 113 lecturers, 81 responses were returned, and there were two incomplete questionnaires. This study had 79 responses that met the requirements of the analysis. The data were analyzed using Variance-based SEM. The results of the data analysis indicate that perceived usefulness is a critical variable in getting social presence in online learning. Meanwhile, the readiness of lecturers in online learning is an essential antecedent of the acceptance of the use of online learning applications

Sagala, G. H., Hasibuan, A. F., & Sriwedari, T. (2022). Readiness, acceptance, and social presence in full online learning. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v6i1.44970

Download Citation

Arends, R. I. (2006). Learning to teach: Belajar untuk mengajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables Wiley. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bonifacio, A. L. (2013, June 16-19). Developing Information Communication Technology (ICT) curriculum standards for K-12 schools in the Philippines. The Sixth Conference of MIT's Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC), MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Budiyani, W., & Sujarwo, S. (2020). Interactive learning multimedia: Enhancing vocabulary mastery for junior high school students. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(2), 295-307.

Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.

Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3).

Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research method. McGraw-Hill.

Damayanti, S. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Sudiatmika, A. (2020). Pengaruh model problem based learning dengan flipped classroom terhadap kemampuan berfikir kreatif. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 83-98.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018.

Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29–47.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465.

Effiyanti, T., & Sagala, G. H. (2018). Technostress among teachers: A confirmation of its stressors and antecedent. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), 134-148.

Fauziyah, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Pengaruh e-learning edmodo dengan model blended learning terhadap minat belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 112-124.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition Pearson Prentice Hall. JOUR.

Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2012). Assessing student perceptions of the benefits of discussions in small-group, large-class, and online learning contexts. College Teaching, 60(2), 65-75.

Hardini, T. I., Setyarini, S., & Harto, S. (2021). Remote learning implemented by bipa teachers during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1).

Hayashi, R., Garcia, M., & Maddawin, A. (2020). Online learning in Sri Lanka's higher education institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Development Bank.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Kemendikbud Terbitkan Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Belajar dari Rumah. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/05/kemendikbud-terbitkan-pedoman-penyelenggaraan-belajar-dari-rumah

Kemenristekdikti, D. J. P. dan K. (2018). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0-Dirjen Belmawa- Ristekdikti. Dirjen Belmawa-Kemenristekdikti.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Leh, A. S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(2), 109-128.

Lu, J., & Price, J. (2018). Chinese students' ICT readiness for a blended teaching and learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2907-2914.

Mayende, G., Prinz, A., Isabwe, G. M. N., & Muyinda, P. B. (2017). Learning groups in MOOCs: Lessons for online learning in higher education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 7(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6925

McGuinness, C., & Fulton, C. (2019). Digital literacy in higher education: A case study of student engagement with e-tutorials using blended learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 1-28.

Naciri, A., Baba, M. A., Achbani, A., & Kharbach, A. (2020). Mobile learning in Higher education: Unavoidable alternative during COVID-19. Aquademia, 4(1), ep20016.

Neamtu, R. (2013). The classroom as an extension of our society: Empowering students through technology in service learning to bridge the global digital divide. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2636-2644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.304.

Nurharjanto, A. A., & Widyantoro, A. (2020). The effect of students'language learning strategy and use of technology in their productive skills'performance. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(2), 213-225.

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.

Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1-18.

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.

Sagala, G. H., Hasibuan, A. F., & Suharianto, J. (2021, June). Readiness to implement digital learning. In 6th Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2020) (pp. 331-338). Atlantis Press.

Sagala, G. H., & Sumiyana. (2020). The intersection of hedonic and utilitarian values on integrated-social media retailers. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 33(4), 505–530.

Sagala, G. H., Zainal, A., & Effiyanti, T. (2017). Attitude toward computer-based statistics among pre-service teacher candidates. Proceedings of MAC, 366.

Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M., de Jong, P., Goh, P.-S., Hege, I., Masters, K., Oh, S.-Y., Patel, R., Premkumar, K., Webb, A., & Pusic, M. (2020). Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish, 3068.

Siswanto, S., Kartanegara, M. A. R., & Chuan, L. S. (2021). Pengaruh penerapan asynchronous learning dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1).

Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.

Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 381-396.

Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having write. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2).

Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2.

Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. (2006). Turning visitors into customers: A usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Management Science, 52(3), 367-382.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in Society, 6, 52-58.

Widhiastuti, R., & Yulianto, A. (2017). Analysis of technology acceptance model in understanding of students behavior intention in use of Sikadu. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(1), 20-27.

Readiness, acceptance, and social presence in full online learning

Authors

Downloads

Login

Information

Current Issue

SidebarMenu

flagcounterblog

ArticleTemplate

Article Template

certificate

Certificate

tools

TOOLS

Editorial Pick

Navigating rhetoric in academic writing: Key structures in effective dissertation

Enhancing digital literacy through gamification-based project learning in social studies for digital natives

Analysis of student decision factors in choosing a study program

How emotional intelligence and self-regulated learning shape fifth-grade students' critical thinking?

Character education with live-in activities (Case study at De Britto College High School Yogyakarta)

ALMUSTRA: An Augmented reality application for introducing traditional musical instruments

Augmented reality: Interactive and fun learning media to improve student learning outcomes

The relationship of science process skills and students' critical thinking skills in momentum and impulse materials

Development of integrative thematic environment-based learning materials

EFL learners' challenges to speak English in online speaking classes

IndexedBy

Indexed In

Keywords

Publisher