Vocational education reform across the taiwan strait: A comparative analysis of governance scale and institutional ecology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v16i1.97938Keywords:
Comparative education, governance scale, institutional ecology, Mainland China, Taiwan, vocational educationAbstract
This study compares vocational education reform in Taiwan and Mainland China to explain why similar reform goals are translated into different institutional practices. Previous cross-strait studies have often examined the two systems separately or compared individual policy measures, while paying limited attention to the institutional logic linking governance scale, institutional ecology, and industrial transition pathways. Using qualitative empirical document analysis within a comparative case-study design, the study analysed 35 core policy, legal, statistical, institutional, and academic sources. Documentary evidence was coded using an integrated six-dimensional comparative framework covering governance structure, institutional composition, curriculum, industry–education cooperation, teacher development, and digital transformation. The findings reveal convergence in the shared emphasis on applied talent cultivation, practical learning, and stronger industry linkages, but divergence in the institutional mechanisms through which these objectives are implemented. Taiwan’s relatively smaller and more diversified technical and vocational education system promotes flexible learning pathways, private institutional participation, and industry–academia collaboration, whereas Mainland China’s large-scale system emphasizes national coordination, strategic programme restructuring, school–enterprise cooperation, and workforce development aligned with industrial upgrading. The study contributes an integrated six-dimensional comparative framework for analysing vocational education reform in culturally connected yet institutionally distinct contexts and provides practical insights for context-sensitive policy learning and vocational education reform.
References
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers' digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Bailey, W., Lavender, K., Youde, A., & Jiao, X. (2024). Experiences from great vocational education policy change in China: A teacher perspective. International Journal of Training Research, 22(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2024.2332350
Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5
Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Springer.
Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358
Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2025). How do vocational teachers use technology? The role of perceived digital competence and perceived usefulness in technology use across different teaching profiles. Vocations and Learning, 18, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-025-09359-4
Deschênes, M., Dionne, L., & Parent, S. (2024). Supporting digital competency development for vocational education student teachers in distance education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1452445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1452445
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000093012
Greinert, W.-D. (2005). Mass vocational education and training in Europe: Classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20th century. Luxembourg: CEDEFOP.
Hu, X., Ke, S., & Han, G. (2018). The characteristics of vocational education in Taiwan and its enlightenment to Mainland China. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 233, 476-480. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-18.2018.106
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luo, T., Ma, H., & Wei, Z. (2026). A cross-strait perspective: A study on the development of new-generation vocational education teacher training and faculty team building: A comparative analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan. Global Education Development Study, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.26689/geds.v2i1.14431
Mende, C., Oswald-Egg, M. E., & Caves, K. (2025). Vocational education and training (VET) system governance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 77(5), 1419-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2461586
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2024). Educational statistics in 2023. Retrieved May 13, 2026, from https://en.moe.gov.cn/documents/statistics/2023/national/
Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2011). Technological and vocational education in Taiwan, ROC. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2025). Education in Taiwan 2024-2025. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China. (2022). Vocational Education Law of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved May 13, 2026, from https://en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn/2022-04/20/c_909970.htm
OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495
Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in comparative vocational education: Existing models and a new approach. Vocations and Learning, 9, 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9154-7
Rahmawati, S., Prestridge, S., Abdullah, A. G., & Widiaty, I. (2025). Unpacking the digital competence challenge in vocational education: A case from Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101803
Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Reich, A., Rooney, D., & Lizier, A. L. (2021). Using technology integration frameworks in vocational education and training. International Journal of Training Research, 19(2), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1864447
Roll, M. J. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Multidisciplinary digital competencies of pre-service vocational teachers. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00112-4
Subrahmanyam, G. (2020). UNESCO-UNEVOC study on the trends shaping the future of TVET teaching. Bonn: UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training.
The State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2024). China's vocational education changes amid push for new quality productive forces. Retrieved May 13, 2026, from https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202411/23/content_WS6741110cc6d0868f4e8ed56d.html
UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning technical and vocational education and training (TVET). Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2021). Trends in digital skills training for TVET teachers and trainers. Bonn: UNESCO-UNEVOC.
World Bank. (2017). Demand-driven skills training and results-based contracting. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2018). Technical and vocational education and training: Lessons from China. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yu, B., Li, R., Zhang, S., Mao, P., Xu, C., Shi, J., & Wu, G. (2025). Constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for industry-education integration in vocational education: An empirical study. PLOS ONE, 20(12), e0339158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339158
Zhao, D., & Selvaratnam, D. P. (2024). A systematic literature review on the reform of vocational education in China. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2343525. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2343525
Zhou, Y., & Xu, G. (2023). Vocational school-enterprise cooperation in China: A review of policy reforms, 1978-2022. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231167895
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi. However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
The copyright transfer agreement form can be downloaded here: [JPV Copyright Transfer Agreement Form]
The copyright form should be signed originally and sent to the Editorial Office through email to jpvokasi@uny.ac.id
