Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Ruang Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v14i2.95482Keywords:
Berpikir reflektif, Gaya kognitif verbalizer, Gaya kognitif visualizer, Masalah bangun ruangAbstract
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir reflektif siswa bergaya kognitif verbalizer dan visualizer dalam menyelesaikan masalah bangun ruang dengan subjek dua siswa kelas IX SMP. Data diperoleh melalui tugas dan wawancara berbasis tugas, lalu dianalisis melalui kondensasi, penyajian, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berpikir reflektif siswa dengan gaya kognitif verbalizer dalam menyelesaikan masalah bangun ruang ditunjukkan melalui pemahaman masalah berdasarkan kata kunci, klarifikasi istilah yang membingungkan, pengorganisasian informasi secara tekstual, pengembangan solusi dengan penalaran verbal, serta pengujian solusi melalui perbandingan hasil secara deskriptif. Sementara itu, berpikir reflektif siswa dengan gaya kognitif visualizer membangun ide awal melalui visualisasi dan gambar, mengatasi kebingungan dengan bantuan representasi visual, mengorganisasi informasi melalui gambar, mengembangkan solusi berdasarkan gambaran ruang, serta menguji solusi melalui perbandingan visual terhadap efisiensi ruang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pentingnya penggunaan representasi verbal dan visual dalam pembelajaran bangun ruang untuk mengembangkan berpikir reflektif siswa.
References
Agustan, S., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T.Y.E. (2017). Reflective thinking in solving an algebra problem: a case study of field independent-prospective teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 893(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/893/1/01200
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, reflective, creative thinking and their reflections on academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
Azimi, E., Kuusisto, E., Hatami, J., & Fardanesh, H. (2023). Perceived barriers and facilitators of the lesson study approach to promoting productive reflective thinking among student teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101303
Chasanah, A.N., As’ari, A.R., & Sulandra, I.M. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita materi bangun ruang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 9(2), 107-115. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v9i1.31642
Chen, M.R.A., & Hwang, G.J. (2022). Effects of experiencing authentic contexts on english speaking performances, anxiety and motivation of EFL students with different cognitive styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1619–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734626
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective rhinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Health and Company.
Dumila, S.M., Nurhayati, & Mariyam. Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem posing terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada materi persamaan linier satu variabel kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, XI(2), 67-76. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.21831/jpms.v11i2.5150
Faizah, S., & Sudirman. (2022). Student thinking process in investigating mathematical statement. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 178–186.
Fatri, F.F., Maison, M., & Syaiful, S. (2019). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa kelas VIII SMP ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 6(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v6i2.14179
Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3907
Hariri, N., Asadi, M., & Mansourian, Y. (2014). The impact of users’ verbal/imagery cognitive styles on their web search behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2013-0019
Husna, A., Hanggara, Y., & Agustyaningrum, N. (2020). Proses berpikir mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ekonomi ditinjau dari kecerdasan logis matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1283–1292.
Isroil, A., & Supriyanto. (2020). Berpikir dan kemampuan matematika. Surabaya: JDS Press.
Jonassen, D.H. (2011). Learning to solve problems. New York: Routlede.
Kholid, M.N., Sa’dijah, C., Hidayanto, E., & Permadi, H. (2020). How are students’ reflective thinking for problem solving? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.688210
King, F.J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2012). Higher order thinking skills. Florida: Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment, Florida State University.
Kurt, S., & Yildirim, I. (2021). The effects of blogging on pre-Service teachers’ reflective thinking and self-efficacy. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1879772
Lee, S., Kwon, B.C., Yang, J., Lee, B.C., & Kim, S.H. (2019). The correlation between users’ cognitive characteristics and visualization literacy. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030488
Lisnani, Zulkardi, & Somakim. (2020). Pengenalan bangun datar melalui konteks museum negeri sumatera selatan balaputera dewa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 359–370.
Lugli, L., Ragni, M., Piccardi, L., & Nori, R. (2017). Hypermedia navigation: differences between spatial cognitive styles. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.038
Luo, Z., O’Steen, B., & Brown, C. (2020). The Use of eye-tracking technology to identify visualisers and verbalisers: accuracy and contributing factors. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2019-0087
Mathias, A.P., Vogel, P., & Knauff, M. (2020). Different cognitive styles can affect performance in laparoscopic surgery skill training. Surgical Endoscopy, 34(11), 4866–4873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07267-y
Mendelson, A.L. (2004). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? effects of the visualizing cognitive style and attention on processing of news photos. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2004.11674600
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (third edition). Arizona: SAGE.
Pambudi, D.S., Iskarina, A.D., Oktavianingtyas, E., Susanto, & Hobri. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir reflektif siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah aritmetika sosial berdasarkan jenis kelamin. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1926–1940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.4036
Pratama, R.A. (2024). Jalur pemikiran menyelami kompleksitas pemikiran manusia. Bogor: Guepedia.
Rosyidin, M.A. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen berpikir tingkat tinggi pada matematika SMP materi bangun ruang sisi datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 10(2), 127-134. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v10i2.41129
Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational psychology (fifth edition). Dallas: Mc Graw Hill.
Siagan, M.V, Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of mathematics module based on M-APOS learning model to improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012083
Solso, R.L., Maclin, O.H., & Maclin, M.K. (2014). Cognitive psychology. United States of America: Pearson.
Winarso, W., & Dewi, W.Y. (2017). Berpikir kritis siswa ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(2), 117–133.
Yoyana, S., & Supriansyah, S. (2025). Pengaruh penggunaan media geoboard terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa pada materi bangun datar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 13(2), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13i2.87825
Zain, N., Marhayati, M., & Abdussakir, A. (2024). Pengembangan quartet mathematics card pada materi geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 12(2), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i2.78842
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Generic License.
