Experimental and Numerical Study on the Comparative Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Beams Based on Metakaolin and Fly Ash

Authors

  • Luki Hariando Purba Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan 20235, Indonesia
  • Bartholomeus Hutagalung Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan 20235, Indonesia
  • Siwan Perangin-angin Civil Engineering Study Program, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan 20235, Indonesia

Keywords:

Concrete, Geopolymer, Metakaolin, Fly-Ash, Flexural

Abstract

This study investigates the flexural behavior of normal concrete (BN), fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (BGPF), and metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete (BGPM) through both experimental testing and Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis. The objective is to compare the mechanical properties, load-bearing capacities, and post-yield behavior of these materials. The experimental results indicate that normal concrete beams (BN) exhibited the highest performance in terms of cracking load, yield load, and maximum load, demonstrating both high strength and ductility. The fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (BGPF) showed lower strength than BN but still performed significantly better than the metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete (BGPM). BGPF displayed a more brittle behavior post-yield, with a sharp reduction in load-bearing capacity, making it less suitable for structures requiring significant post-yield deformation. The BGPM beams demonstrated the lowest mechanical performance, primarily due to insufficient curing. The metakaolin material was only heated to 200°C due to laboratory limitations, far below the optimal temperature of 700-800°C necessary for full geopolymerization. As a result, the BGPM beams remained brittle and exhibited minimal load-bearing capacity compared to BN and BGPF. FEM analysis, while providing useful insights into the flexural trends, tended to overestimate the load-bearing capacities and deflections across all beam types compared to experimental results. In conclusion, geopolymer concrete, particularly fly ash-based, shows promise as an alternative to traditional concrete, though its mechanical properties, especially ductility and post-yield behavior, require further optimization. The study highlights the importance of proper curing processes, especially for metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete, to fully realize its potential as a sustainable building material. Future research should focus on refining these processes to enhance the strength and flexibility of geopolymer concrete.

References

[1] G. George, P. K. Shreeram, A. S. Minalan, K. Lokesh, M. Mano, and A. Prince, “Numerical investigation on the flexural behavior of geopolymer concrete beam reinforced with different types of fiber-reinforced polymer bars,” Mater. Today Proc., 2023.

[2] S. A. Eftekhar Afzali, M. A. Shayanfar, M. Ghanooni-Bagha, E. Golafshani, and T. Ngo, “The use of machine learning techniques to investigate the properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete,” J. Clean Prod., vol. 446, p. 141305, 2024.

[3] H. Yang, Q. Yang, J. Mei, Y. Jiang, and J. Luo, “Acoustic emission characteristics of stainless steel reinforced geopolymer coral concrete beams under four-point bending,” Structures, vol. 58, p. 105637, 2023.

[4] A. E. Alexander and A. P. Shashikala, “Studies on the mechanical and durability performance of textile reinforced geopolymer concrete beams,” Mater. Today Commun., vol. 35, p. 105837, 2023.

[5] E. S. Lie and R. Rachmansyah, “Rasio Nilai Kuat Lentur pada Beton Geopolimer dengan Penambahan Superplasticizer,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 19, pp. 265–277, 2023.

[6] J. Cai, X. Li, J. Tan, and B. Vandevyvere, “Thermal and compressive behaviors of fly ash and metakaolin-based geopolymer,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 30, p. 101307, 2020.

[7] R. Pouhet and M. Cyr, “Formulation and performance of flash metakaolin geopolymer concretes,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 120, pp. 150–160, 2016.

[8] A. Shibayama and M. Nishiyama, “Shear strength of reinforced fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete beams with and without shear reinforcement,” Structures, vol. 50, pp. 603–614, 2023.

[9] M. Amin, Y. Elsakhawy, K. Abu el-hassan, and B. A. Abdelsalam, “Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 16, p. e00976, 2022.

[10] A. S. Albidah, “Shear behaviour of metakaolin-fly ash based geopolymer concrete deep beams,” Eng. Struct., vol. 275, p. 115271, 2023.

[11] M. A. Hasan, T. Sheehan, A. Ashour, and O. Elkezza, “Flexural behaviour of geopolymer concrete T-Beams reinforced with GFRP bars,” Structures, vol. 49, pp. 345–364, 2023.

[12] W. Xu, X. Niu, and Y. Zhu, “Deformation behavior and damage evaluation of fly ash-slag based geopolymer concrete under cyclic tension,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 86, p. 108664, 2024.

[13] A. Purbasari and T. W. Samadhi, “Kajian Dehidroksilasi Termal Kaolin menjadi Metakaolin menggunakan Analisis Termogravimetri,” ALCHEMY J. Penelit. Kim., vol. 17, pp. 105–112, 2021.

[14] M. H. Ashfaq, M. B. Sharif, M. Irfan-ul-Hassan, U. us Sahar, U. Akmal, and A. Mohamed, “Up-scaling of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete to investigate the binary effect of locally available metakaolin with fly ash,” Heliyon, vol. 10, p. e26331, 2024.

[15] K. Singh, “Experimental study on metakaolin and bagasse ash based geopolymer concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 37, pp. 3289–3295, 2020.

[16] B. Aouan, S. Alehyen, M. Fadil, M. EL Alouani, A. Khabbazi, A. Atbir, et al., “Compressive strength optimization of metakaolin‐based geopolymer by central composite design,” Chem. Data Collect., vol. 31, p. 100636, 2021.

[17] A. V. Lopes, S. M. R. Lopes, and M. I. M. Pinto, “Flexural stiffness and structural behavior of alkali-activated metakaolin faced with cement-based beams,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 76, p. 107310, 2023.

[18] A. E. Lianasari, A. Lisantono, and J. J. Sudjati, “Shear behavior of fly ash-based geopolymer R/C beam with bauxites as coarse aggregates: Experimental program,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 20, pp. 155–160, 2021.

[19] F. A. Shilar, S. V. Ganachari, V. B. Patil, I. Neelakanta Reddy, and J. Shim, “Preparation and validation of sustainable metakaolin based geopolymer concrete for structural application,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 371, p. 130688, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

Purba, L. H., Hutagalung, B., & Perangin-angin, S. (2025). Experimental and Numerical Study on the Comparative Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Beams Based on Metakaolin and Fly Ash. Inersia : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Arsitektur, 21(1), 46–56. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uny.ac.id/index.php/inersia/article/view/78027

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): May

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Luki Hariando Purba, Bartholomeus Hutagalung, Siwan Perangin-angin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with INERSIA journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the INERSIA journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Lisensi Creative Commons
INERSIA by https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/inersia was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License