Spatial Characteristics of Permanent Relocation Housing in Disaster-Prone Areas of Cangkringan
Keywords:
spatial character, Post disaster relocation, Mountain slope settlements, Evacuation resilience, Merapi eruptionAbstract
The Merapi relocation permanent residential settlements (huntap) are spread across 2 sub-districts, Cangkringan and Minggir. The relocation located in Disaster Prone Area (KRB) 2, an area with a high level of vulnerability. The settlements are in rural areas contoured by mountain slopes. This study aims to describe and identify the condition of the spatial character of huntap settlements from an accessibility perspective. Aspects that influence regional emergencies in the mitigation stage are the complexity of shelters, shelter buildings, land morphology, settlement accessibility and preservation facilities. This research was carried out qualitatively deductively with 18 objects of observation in the Merapi relocation huntap settlements. Data were collected from contour data (GIS-Google Earth), primary & secondary literature studies, observations and interviews. This classification is then analyzed based on physical characteristics in the form of buildings, land and preservation facilities. The character of the building will influence the shape of the road pattern and the level of visibility. The morphological characteristics of the land will influence the ease of mobility based on the shape of the road and human movement. The nature of preservation facilities will affect the level of wayfinding which residents can recognise their environment.. So to support the optimization of the success of the evacuation process, the main road is in a position parallel to the contour line, minimizing the potential for density accumulation. There is an open area between the grid so that the level of visibility is wider. Minimizing the number of intersections in areas that are segregated/separated from other areas. Adding access gates to the entrance and exit to prevent bottlenecks, accumulation in the gate area.. It is hoped that this study can be used as a reference, recommendation and basis for the government, architects, urban designers or planners in designing relocation shelters at other points.
References
[1] S. Surono et al., “The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano—a ‘100-year’ event, ” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.,vol. 241–242, pp. 121–135, 2012.
[2] E. T. W. Mei et al., “Lessons learned from the 2010 evacuations at Merapi volcano, ” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.,vol. 261, pp. 348–365, 2013.
[3] I. Ahmed and E. R. Charlesworth, “An evaluation framework for assessing resilience of post-disaster housing, ” Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ.,vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 300–312, 2015.
[4] E. Maly, K. Iuchi, and A. Nareswari, “Community-based housing reconstruction and relocation: REKOMPAK program after the 2010 eruption of Mt. Merapi, Indonesia, ” J. Soc. Saf. Sci.,vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 205–214, 2015.
[5] A. Hermawan, B. Guntoro, and M. Sulhan, “Community engagement for disaster preparedness in rural areas of Mount Merapi, Indonesia, ” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan.,vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1505–1518, 2024.
[6] K. Donovan and A. Suryanto, “Community resilience and relocation in the face of environmental disasters: The case of Mount Merapi, Indonesia, ” Geoforum,vol. 102, 2019.
[7] D. C. Sari, “Transformasi fisik pada hunian tetap Dongkelsari Cangkringan Sleman,” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020.
[8] BPBD, “Profil Huntap Relokasi Merapi,” 2016.
[9] D. Marwasta and K. D. Priyono, “Analisis karakteristik permukiman desa-desa pesisir di Kabupaten Kulonprogo, ” Forum Geogr.,vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2016.
[10] L. M. Lautetu, V. A. Kumurur, and F. Warouw, “Karakteristik permukiman masyarakat pada kawasan pesisir Kecamatan Bunaken,” Karakteristik Permukim. Masy. Pada Kaw. Pesisir Kec. Bunaken, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 126–136, 2019.
[11] R. Sasongko, W. Astuti, and G. Yudana, “Pola spasial permukiman di bantaran Sungai Premulung, Kota Surakarta, ” Desa-Kota,vol. 4, no. 2, p. 152, 2022.
[12] M. L. Dewi and W. Kurniawati, “Transformasi fisik spasial kampung kota di Kelurahan Kembangsari Semarang, ” RUANG,2013.
[13] K. Iuchi and J. Mutter,“Post-disaster housing relocation and livelihood sustainability: A case study of the 2010 Mount Merapi eruption in Indonesia,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 46, 2020.
[14] J. Thouret and F. Lavigne,“Land use planning and volcanic risk mitigation: A GIS-based approach for Merapi volcano, Indonesia,” Nat. Hazards, vol. 103, no. 1, 2020.
[15] L. N. Groat, Architectural Research Methods, 2nd ed. 1946.
[16] F. Masykur, “Metode dalam mencari pengetahuan: Sebuah pendekatan rasionalisme, ” Tarbawi,vol. 1, pp. 58–63, 2019.
[17] R. Karsa, “Kustianingrum, dkk,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015.
[18] N. Indria, M. Iftironi, and H. H. Khumaira, “Karakter spasial permukiman tepi sungai: Studi kasus Desa Tampelas Kecamatan Kamipang, Kabupaten Katingan, Kalimantan Tengah,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 857–872, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/46931
[19] P. H. Pramitasari, “Karakteristik spasial bangunan pada permukiman padat penduduk di Kota Malang: Objek studi Kampung Warna-Warni Jodipan dan Kampung Muria, Kota Malang,” 2021.
[20] H. P. Novira and P. R. Satiawan, “Konfigurasi spasial kawasan permukiman Kampung Maspati, ” J. Tek. ITS,vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2–7, 2021.
[21] ESDM, “Peta kawasan rawan bencana,” magma.esdm.go.id.
[22] A. A. Redzuan et al., “A review: Adaptation of escape route for a framework of road disaster resilient, ” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.,vol. 615, no. 1, 2019.
[23] W. Donner and W. Diaz, Methodological Issues in Disaster Research, 2018.
[24] F. Lavigne and Y. Gunnell, “The role of spatial planning in enhancing resilience to volcanic risk: The case of Mount Merapi, Indonesia, ” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.,vol. 19, no. 12, 2019.
[25] H. A. A. Mohy and K. G. Rasheed, “Morphological perspective of urban resilience through eco urban landscape: Iraq-Basra as a case study, ” Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodynamics,vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 807–821, 2022.
[26] S. Sagala and N. Okada, “Spatial planning and resilience following disasters: A case study of relocation after the 2010 Merapi eruption, ” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci.,vol. 10, no. 3, 2019.
[27] B. Wisner and J. Gaillard,“Accessibility and evacuation in volcanic eruptions: A case study of Merapi, Indonesia,” J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., vol. 374, 2019.
[28] G. Lizarralde and L. Bornstein, “Evaluating post-disaster housing reconstruction: A spatial analysis of relocation programs in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, ” Habitat Int.,vol. 98, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 muhamad rafif naufal, Ardhya Nareswari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with INERSIA journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the INERSIA journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
INERSIA by https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/inersia was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
