Adaptasi dan evaluasi Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) 17 versi Indonesia pada karyawan di Yogyakarta

I Gusti Ngurah Alit Kepakisan; Rosita Endang Kusmaryani

doi:10.21831/ap.v8i1.87815

Authors

I Gusti Ngurah Alit Kepakisan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Rosita Endang Kusmaryani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/ap.v8i1.87815

Keywords:

adaptasi alat ukur, confirmatory factor analysis, reliabilitas, utrecht work engagement scale, work engagement

Abstract

Instrumen yang biasanya digunakan untuk mengukur work engagement adalah Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). Namun versi UWES bahasa Indonesia masih tergolong panjang. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengadaptasi dan mengevaluasi alat ukur UWES-17 versi Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kuantitatif. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 133 karyawan di Yogyakarta dengan teknik convenience sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menyebar kuesioner menggunakan Google forms. Adaptasi dilakukan berdasar panduan dari Beaton. Adapun analisis yang digunakan yaitu confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) untuk menguji validitas konstruk alat ukur. Hasil adaptasi ditemukan beberapa perbaikan minor pada kalimat dan seluruh item dapat digunakan. Hasil CFA menunjukkan bahwa UWES-17 versi bahasa Indonesia memiliki model fit yang baik. Hasil reliabilitas UWES-17 didapatkan bahwa seluruh dimensi dan keseluruhan instrumen memiliki nilai alpha diatas 0,700. Secara keseluruhan, UWES-17 versi bahasa Indonesia dapat digunakan untuk mengukur work engagement pada karyawan di Yogyakarta.

References

Apriandi, D., Retnawati, H., & Maman Abadi, A. (2022). Construct validity and reliability of the learning motivation questionnaire. TEM Journal, 11(4), 1494–1499. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM114-09

Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Chou, C.-Y., Huang, C.-Y., Huang, Y.-J., Lin, G.-H., Huang, S.-L., Lee, S.-C., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2017). Comparison of construct validity of two short forms of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale. PLOS ONE, 12(12), e0188478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188478

de Coelho, G. L., Monteiro, R. P., de Oliveira Santos, L. C., de Carvalho Mendes, L. A., Veloso Gouveia, V., & Nunes da Fonsêca, P. (2023). Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES): Psychometric parameters in Brazil. Suma Psicológica, 30(2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2023.v30.n2.2

Fong, T. C., & Ng, S. (2012). Measuring engagement at work: Validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6

Furr, R. M. (2021). Psychometrics: An introduction (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guildford Press.

Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthi, F., & Purwono, U. (2019). Analisis rasch dalam Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.204-217

Kulikowski, K. (2017). Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool – A literature review. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 30(2), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947

Kulikowski, K. (2019). One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 25(2), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958

Lovakov, A. V., Agadullina, E. R., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 10(1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2017.0111

MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490

Merino-Soto, C., Lozano-Huamán, M., Lima-Mendoza, S., Calderón de la Cruz, G., Juárez-García, A., & Toledano-Toledano, F. (2022). Ultrashort version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A psychometric assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020890

Nerstad, C. G. L., Richardsen, A. M., & Martinussen, M. (2009). Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00770.x

Price, P. C., Jhangiani, R. S., & Chiang, I. C. A. (2015). Research methods in psychology (2nd Canadi). The Saylor Foundation.

Radic, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Ariza-Montes, A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2020). Job demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102518

Rastogi, A., Pati, S. P., Kumar, P., Dixit, J. K., & Pradhan, S. (2018). Student engagement in Indian context: UWES-S validation and relationship with burnout and life satisfaction. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 9(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2018.091340

Sanhokwe, H. (2022). The dimensionality of the UWES-17 and UWES-9: Testing second-order and bifactor models. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 32(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2022.2027616

Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the job demands-resources model. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004a). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. (1st version). Occupational Health Psychology Unit: Utrecht University

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004b). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. (1.1 version). Occupational Health Psychology Unit: Utrecht University.

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 20(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800701217878

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Shaleh, A. R., Hayat, B., & Samudera, A. (2025). UWES-17 in the Indonesian context: Rasch analysis. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 14(1), 96–115. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v14i1.46003

Silva, J., Ferreira, M., Pacheco, P., & Almeida, A. (2023). School leadership engagement: validation of the Portuguese version of UWES scale. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217806

Tomietto, M., Paro, E., Sartori, R., Maricchio, R., Clarizia, L., De Lucia, P., Pedrinelli, G., & Finos, R. (2019). Work engagement and perceived work ability: An evidence‐based model to enhance nurses’ well‐being. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(9), 1933–1942. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13981

Torabinia, M., Mahmoudi, S., Dolatshahi, M., & Abyaz, M. R. (2017). Measuring engagement in nurses: the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic Of Iran, 31(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.18869/mjiri.31.15

Tran, T. T. T., Watanabe, K., Imamura, K., Nguyen, H. T., Sasaki, N., Kuribayashi, K., Sakuraya, A., Nguyen, N. T., Bui, T. M., Nguyen, Q. T., Truong, T. Q., Nguyen, G. T. H., Minas, H., Tsutsumi, A., Shimazu, A., & Kawakami, N. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12157

Vallières, F., McAuliffe, E., Hyland, P., Galligan, M., & Ghee, A. (2017). Measuring work engagement among community health workers in Sierra Leone: Validating the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Revista de Psicología Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 33(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.12.001

Yudhistira, S. Y., Tiatri, S., & Mularsih, H. (2018). Pengujian confirmatory factor analysis alat ukur UWES-SS versi Indonesia. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 1(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i2.970